煤矿谐振接地故障模糊综合选线方法

马春艳; 龚瑛

doi:10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2015.11.020

煤矿谐振接地故障模糊综合选线方法

马春艳^{1, 2},
龚瑛³

1.
武汉科技大学信息科学与工程学院，湖北武汉430081
2.
湖北汽车工业学院电气信息工程学院，湖北十堰442002
3.
广东电网佛山供电局，广东佛山528000

基金项目:

湖北省教育厅科学技术研究项目(B2015122）

详细信息

中图分类号: TD608
计量
- 文章访问数: 51
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 8
出版历程
- 刊出日期: 2015-11-09

Fuzzy comprehensive line selection method of resonance grounding fault in coal mine

MA Chunyan^{1, 2},
GONG Ying³

1.
College of Information Science and Engineering, University of Wuhan Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
2.
College of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Hubei Automotive T

摘要

摘要: 针对谐振接地系统中依据稳态分量的故障选线方法失效的问题，从暂态分量角度甄选了零序能量法、小波变换法和增强小波包法进行分析。引入模糊综合选线方法对3种方法进行集成，并运用层次分析法确定3种方法的权重。仿真分析结果表明, 零序能量法和增强小波包法的可靠性较好，而小波变换法出现了误判，可靠性较差；模糊综合选线方法没有受到其他错误信号的干扰，给出了正确结论，具有较强的可靠性。
- 谐振接地系统 /
- 模糊综合选线方法 /
- 故障选线 /
- 暂态分量 /
- 层次分析法
Abstract: For failure of fault line selection methods based on steady-state component in resonance grounding system, three kinds of methods were analyzed from the perspective of transient component including zero-sequence energy method, wavelet transform method and enhancing wavelet packet method. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was introduced to integrate the three kinds of methods, and AHP method was used to determine weights of the three methods. The simulation conclusion shows that the reliability of zero-sequence energy method and enhancing wavelet packet method are better, but wavelet transform methods has false conclusion, with poor reliability; The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is not interfered by other error signal, and gives correct conclusion, which has strong reliability.
- resonance grounding system /
- fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method /
- fault line selection /
- steady-state component /
- AHP