NI Xing. Optimization of multi-hole hydraulic cutting combined extraction parameters under superposition effect[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2023,49(1):146-152. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022060110
Citation: NI Xing. Optimization of multi-hole hydraulic cutting combined extraction parameters under superposition effect[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2023,49(1):146-152. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022060110

Optimization of multi-hole hydraulic cutting combined extraction parameters under superposition effect

More Information
  • Received Date: June 29, 2022
  • Revised Date: August 28, 2022
  • Available Online: August 29, 2022
  • In the process of hydraulic cutting in low permeability and high gas coal seams, there are problems such as unclear cutting disturbance range and unclear optimal hole spacing for cutting drilling. In order to solve the above problems, the 1908 working face of Gaoshan Coal Mine in Yuneng, Guizhou Province is taken as the research background. On the basis of establishing the fluid-solid coupling model of gas extraction in coal body with hydraulic cutting, with the help of COMSOL numerical simulation software, the effective extraction radius of hydraulic cutting borehole and the change of gas pressure around the borehole in the 1908 working face of Gaoshan Coal Mine are studied. Based on the simulation results, the effective extraction range and gas pressure change between holes are analyzed under the influence of the extraction superposition effect between holes when the hydraulic cutting drilling holes are arranged in multiple holes. Finally, the optimal hole spacing and extraction time are obtained. The results show the following points. ① The single hole extraction effect of hydraulic cutting drilling is significantly improved with the cutting depth. However, the effective extraction radius of the borehole increases slowly. In order to obtain the best cutting depth, the effective extraction radius of each borehole is fitted in a trinomial way. With the increase of hydraulic cutting depth, the range of effective extraction radius slows down after rapid increase and finally tends to be stable. The optimal cutting depth of Gaoshan Coal Mine is 1.5 m, and the effective extraction radius is 3.1 m. ② Under the same extraction time, the gas pressure in the coal body decreases with the shortening of the distance between two holes. It shows that the smaller the hole spacing is, the more serious the disturbance caused by hydraulic cutting between holes is, and the more significant the influence of the extraction superposition effect is. ③ On the premise of ensuring that the outburst elimination meets the standard, it is best to choose a hole spacing of 7 m for arranging hydraulic cutting drilling. ④ Originally, in the "square" hole arrangement, the maximum gas pressure at the point where the blind area may occur at the hole center is only 0.67 MPa, which is less than the critical value. The effective coverage area of the "square" hole arrangement is larger than that of the "triangle" hole arrangement, and the repeated area of drainage is reduced. This reduces the amount of drilling and improves the efficiency of gas control. ⑤ Through field test, it is concluded that in the 60 d extraction period, the hydraulic cutting drilling arrangement with a hole spacing of 7 m and a "square" hole arrangement can effectively improve the concentration and purity of gas extraction. It can also extend the period of high efficiency extraction. It can eliminate the blank zone of gas extraction in the coal body between boreholes to eliminate the outburst of the coal body in the area between boreholes.
  • [1]
    荆俊杰,于丽雅,延婧. 高瓦斯低渗煤层水力造穴增透技术优化研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2022,53(1):8-14,23.

    JING Junjie,YU Liya,YAN Jing. Research on optimization of hydraulic flushing and permeability enhancement technology in high gas and low permeability coal seam[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2022,53(1):8-14,23.
    [2]
    袁亮,林柏泉,杨威. 我国煤矿水力化技术瓦斯治理研究进展及发展方向[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2015,43(1):45-49. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2015.01.011

    YUAN Liang,LIN Baiquan,YANG Wei. Research progress and development direction of gas control with mine hydraulic technology in China coal mine[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2015,43(1):45-49. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2015.01.011
    [3]
    许克南,王佰顺,刘青宏. 基于动态流固耦合模型的瓦斯 抽采半径及孔间距研究[J]. 煤炭科学术,2018,46(5):102-108.

    XU Kenan,WANG Baishun,LIU Qinghong. Study on gas drainage radius and distance between boreholes based on dynamic fluid-solid coupling model[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2018,46(5):102-108.
    [4]
    杜金磊,张民波,张电吉,等. 低透气突出煤层水力割缝协同卸压增透技术[J]. 工矿自动化,2021,47(7):98-105. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.17698

    DU Jinlei,ZHANG Minbo,ZHANG Dianji,et al. Hydraulic cutting cooperative pressure relief and premeability enhancement technology in low permeability outburst coal seam[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2021,47(7):98-105. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.17698
    [5]
    刘生龙,朱传杰,林柏泉,等. 水力割缝空间分布模式对煤层卸压增透的作用规律[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2020,37(5):983-990. DOI: 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2020.05.015

    LIU Shenglong,ZHU Chuanjie,LIN Baiquan,et al. The effect of spatial distribution mode of hydraulic slotting on pressure relief and permeability enhancement of the coal seam[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2020,37(5):983-990. DOI: 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2020.05.015
    [6]
    孙鑫,王海东,路丽刚. 煤层水力割缝转速对切割半径影 响规律研究[J]. 煤炭工程,2020,52(5):116-120.

    SUN Xin,WANG Haidong,LU Ligang. Research on the influence of coal seam hydraulic cutting speed on cutting radius[J]. Coal Engineering,2020,52(5):116-120.
    [7]
    袁本庆. 煤巷条带水力化增透技术措施适用条件及评价指标初探[J]. 煤矿安全,2018,49(12):164-168. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2018.12.042

    YUAN Benqing. Application conditions and evaluation indexes of hydraulic permeability enhancement technology in coal roadway strip mining[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2018,49(12):164-168. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2018.12.042
    [8]
    林柏泉,赵洋,刘厅,等. 水力割缝煤体多场耦合响应规律研究[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2017,37(5):662-667. DOI: 10.13800/j.cnki.xakjdxxb.2017.0510

    LIN Baiquan,ZHAO Yang,LIU Ting,et al. Coupling response law of multi-field in coal seam after hydraulic slotting[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2017,37(5):662-667. DOI: 10.13800/j.cnki.xakjdxxb.2017.0510
    [9]
    徐刚,张剀文,范亚飞. 叠加效应影响下钻孔有效抽采半径的数值模拟及布孔间距优化[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2021,48(1):91-96. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2021.01.018

    XU Gang,ZHANG Kaiwen,FAN Yafei. Numerical simulation of effective drainage radius and optimization of hole spacing under the influence of stack effect[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2021,48(1):91-96. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2021.01.018
    [10]
    ZHANG Hongbin,LIU Jishan,ELSWORTH D. How sorption-induced matrix deformation affects gas flow in coal seams:a new FE model[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2008,45(8):1226-1236. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.11.007
    [11]
    刘泉霖,王恩元,李忠辉,等. 夹矸对煤层瓦斯抽采影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 工矿自动化,2018,44(2):55-62. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2017100046

    LIU Quanlin,WANG Enyuan,LI Zhonghui,et al. Numerical simulation study on influence of gangue on coal seam gas drainage[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2018,44(2):55-62. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2017100046
    [12]
    李文,王广宏,欧聪,等. 不同布孔方式下梳状定向长钻孔水力压裂数值模拟及工程应用[J]. 煤矿安全,2021,52(5):72-77. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2021.05.013

    LI Wen,WANG Guanghong,OU Cong,et al. Numerical simulation and engineering application of comb-shaped directional long borehole hydraulic fracturing under different arrangement of holes[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2021,52(5):72-77. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2021.05.013
  • Related Articles

    [1]XIAO Linjing, YAO Peixin, LIU Rui, MA Shanqing, MA Chenghan. Automatic layout of pipeline in coal preparation plant based on optimized A* algorithm[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2022, 48(11): 73-79. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022080085
    [2]JIANG Mingquan, KANG Xiangtao, YAN Chaoxing, TANG Meng, WANG Ziyi. Study on effective extraction radius of bedding borehole under the impact of normal fault[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2022, 48(2): 55-60. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2021070015
    [3]DU Jinlei, ZHANG Minbo, ZHANG Dianji, ZHANG Dangyu, ZHANG Zhen, CUI Li, WANG Zichao, LI Chunxin, ZHANG Fujian. Hydraulic cutting cooperative pressure relief and permeability enhancement technology in low permeability outburst coal seam[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2021, 47(7): 98-105. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.17698
    [4]LIU Dianping, MA Wenwei. Research on determination method of effective drainage radius of gas drainage borehole[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2020, 46(11): 59-64. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671 -251x.2020060058
    [5]SANG Naiwen, YANG Shengqiang, SONG Yawei. Research on effective drainage radius and rational borehole spacing of parallel boreholes[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2019, 45(6): 58-62. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2019010048
    [6]WANG Jie, MAO Guoyong, CHEN Haiqin. Research on optimization of layout method of cooling system on coal face[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2018, 44(12): 43-48. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2018010012
    [7]WEI Fengqing, CHENG Peidong, ZHANG Junxiang, DU Xiaoqi. Study on numerical simulation of effective drainage radius of drilling hole in coal seam[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2016, 42(7): 25-29. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2016.07.007
    [8]WEI Wenhui, GUO Ye. Boundary effects optimization of ZigBee wireless location based on BP neural network[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2014, 40(11): 65-70. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2014.11.016
    [9]WANG Xing, WANG Fei, LIU Xiang, HAO Yabing. Measurement of effective radius of gas drainage of bedding drill hole in low permeability coal seam[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2014, 40(8): 88-91. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2014.08.023
    [10]XIN Hai-hui~, CAO Xin-qi~, LI Wen-guang~, ZHAI Cheng~, LIN Bai-quan~. Measurement of Effective Degassing Radius of Advancing Hole for Gas Drainage[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2010, 36(2): 77-79.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (163) PDF downloads (25) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return