DU Jingyi, DANG Mengke, QIAO Lei, et al. Drill pipe counting method based on improved spatial-temporal graph convolution neural network[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2023,49(1):90-98. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022030098
Citation: DU Jingyi, DANG Mengke, QIAO Lei, et al. Drill pipe counting method based on improved spatial-temporal graph convolution neural network[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2023,49(1):90-98. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022030098

Drill pipe counting method based on improved spatial-temporal graph convolution neural network

More Information
  • Received Date: March 28, 2022
  • Revised Date: December 27, 2022
  • Available Online: September 07, 2022
  • There are some problems in the existing drill pipe counting methods, such as repeated labor, large counting error, and failure to consider the timing information of actions. In order to solve the above problems, a drill pipe counting method based on an improved multi spatial-temporal graph convolution neural network (MST-GCN) model is proposed. Firstly, the video data of underground drilling is obtained through the mine monitoring camera. The Alphabose algorithm is used to extract the key points of the human body from the image sequence. The human skeleton on a single frame image and the skeleton sequence data on a continuous image sequence are obtained. The skeleton sequence representing human actions is built. Secondly, the MST-GCN model is designed based on the spatial-temporal graph convolution neural network (ST-GCN) model. The far space partition strategy is used to focus on the motion information of the key points that are far away from the skeleton. The squeeze and excitation network (SENet) is used to fuse the original space features and the far space features, so as to effectively identify the action categories on the skeleton sequence. Finally, support vector machine is used to identify the drilling pose on the drilling video to decide whether to save the skeleton sequence. If the sequence length is saved to 150 frames, the MST-GCN model is used to identify the action category. The identification interval of adjacent actions is set according to the actual drilling time, so as to record the number of actions and realize the drill pipe counting. The experimental results show that the recognition accuracy of the MST-GCN model is 91.1% on the self-built data set, which is 6.2%, 19.0% and 4.8% higher than that of ST-GCN, Alphapose-LSTM and NST-GCN, respectively. The loss value of the MST-GCN model converges below 0.2, and the learning capability is stronger. On the drilling videos under the same conditions, the average error values of the MST-GCN model, the artificial method and the improved ResNet method are 0.25, 0.75 and 21 respectively, which shows that the counting effect of the MST-GCN model is better. The average error of MST-GCN model is 9 and the miscount is low in the field application of drilling 1 300 pieces, which can meet the actual requirements.
  • [1]
    梁运培, 郑梦浩, 李全贵, 等. 我国煤与瓦斯突出预测与预警研究综述[J/OL]. 煤炭学报: 1-24[2022-12-08]. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2022.0965.

    LIANG Yunpei, ZHENG Menghao, LI Quangui, et al. A review on prediction and early warning methods of coal and gas outburst[J/OL]. Journal of China Coal Society: 1-24[2022-12-08]. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2022.0965.
    [2]
    PAN Xiaokang,CHENG Hao,CHEN Jie,et al. An experimental study of the mechanism of coal and gas outbursts in the tectonic regions[J]. Engineering Geology,2020,279:105883. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105883.
    [3]
    谢和平,周宏伟,薛东杰,等. 我国煤与瓦斯共采:理论、技术与工程[J]. 煤炭学报,2014,39(8):1391-1397.

    XIE Heping,ZHOU Hongwei,XUE Dongjie,et al. Theory,technology and engineering of simultaneous exploitation of coal and gas in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2014,39(8):1391-1397.
    [4]
    李东前. 煤矿瓦斯防治技术研究[J]. 当代化工研究,2021(10):99-100. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8114.2021.10.049

    LI Dongqian. Study on coal mine gas prevention and control technology[J]. Modern Chemical Research,2021(10):99-100. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8114.2021.10.049
    [5]
    李树刚,包若羽,张天军,等. 本煤层瓦斯抽采钻孔合理密封深度确定[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2019,39(2):183-188,216.

    LI Shugang,BAO Ruoyu,ZHANG Tianjun,et al. Determining the rational sealing depth for horizontal gas drainage borehole[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2019,39(2):183-188,216.
    [6]
    孙志飞,吴银成,胡云. 钻杆长度测量方法[J]. 工矿自动化,2015,41(3):51-53.

    SUN Zhifei,WU Yincheng,HU Yun. Length measurement methods of drill pipe[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2015,41(3):51-53.
    [7]
    徐钊,房咪咪,周红伟,等. 基于电驻波的锚杆长度无损测量方法[J]. 工矿自动化,2013,39(9):112-115. DOI: 10.7526/j.issn.1671-251X.2013.09.029

    XU Zhao,FANG Mimi,ZHOU Hongwei,et al. Non-destructive measurement method of anchor stock length based on electricity standing wave[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2013,39(9):112-115. DOI: 10.7526/j.issn.1671-251X.2013.09.029
    [8]
    董立红,王杰,厍向阳. 基于改进Camshift算法的钻杆计数方法[J]. 工矿自动化,2015,41(1):71-76.

    DONG Lihong,WANG Jie,SHE Xiangyang. Drill counting method based on improved Camshift algorithm[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2015,41(1):71-76.
    [9]
    高瑞,郝乐,刘宝,等. 基于改进ResNet网络的井下钻杆计数方法[J]. 工矿自动化,2020,46(10):32-37.

    GAO Rui,HAO Le,LIU Bao,et al. Research on underground drill pipe counting method based on improved ResNet network[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2020,46(10):32-37.
    [10]
    党伟超,姚远,白尚旺,等. 煤矿探水卸杆动作识别研究[J]. 工矿自动化,2020,46(7):107-112.

    DANG Weichao,YAO Yuan,BAI Shangwang,et al. Research on unloading drill-rod action identification in coal mine water exploration[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2020,46(7):107-112.
    [11]
    YAN Sijie, XIONG Yuanjun, LIN Dahua. Spatial temporal graph convolutional networks for skeleton-based action recognition[C]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, 2018: 5361-5368.
    [12]
    FANG Haoshu, XIE Shuqin, TAI Yuwing, et al. RMPE: regional multi-person pose estimation[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, 2017: 2334-2343.
    [13]
    HU Jie, SHEN Li, SUN Gang. Squeeze-and-excitation networks[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, 2018: 7132-7141.
    [14]
    KE Qiuhong, BENNAMOUN M, AN Senjian, et al. A new representation of skeleton sequences for 3D action recognition[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, 2017: 3288-3297.
    [15]
    卫少洁,周永霞. 一种结合Alphapose和LSTM的人体摔倒检测模型[J]. 小型微型计算机系统,2019,40(9):1886-1890. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1220.2019.09.014

    WEI Shaojie,ZHOU Yongxia. Human body fall detection model combining Alphapose and LSTM[J]. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems,2019,40(9):1886-1890. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1220.2019.09.014
    [16]
    杨世强, 李卓, 王金华, 等. 基于新分区策略的ST−GCN人体动作识别[J/OL]. 计算机集成制造系统: 1-16[2022-03-29]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5946.TP.20211022.1500.014.html.

    YANG Shiqiang, LI Zhuo, WANG Jinhua, et al. ST-GCN human action based on new partition strategy[J/OL]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems: 1-16[2022-03-29]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5946.TP.20211022.1500.014.html.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Real-Time Counting for Underground Drill Pipes Based on Miner’s Pose Estimation and Actions Recognition[J]. Journal of Mine Automation.
    [2]HAO Qinxia, LI Huimin. Recognition model of IIoT equipment in coal mine[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2024, 50(3): 99-107. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2023100092
    [3]WU Jiangwei, NAN Bingfei. Method for recognizing coal flow status of scraper conveyor in working face[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2023, 49(11): 60-66. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2023080101
    [4]QIN Jiaxin, GE Shuwei, LONG Fengqi, ZHANG Yongqian, LI Xue. Spatiotemporal distribution prediction of gas concentration based on GCN-GRU[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2023, 49(5): 82-89, 111. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022060105
    [5]LI Shanhua, XIAO Tao, LI Xiaoli, YANG Fazhan, YAO Yong, ZHAO Peipei. Miner action recognition model based on DRCA-GCN[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2023, 49(4): 99-105, 112. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022120023
    [6]XIANG Xueyi, LEI Zhipeng, LI Linbo, REN Ruibin, LI Jie, WANG Feiyu. Action recognition method for mine kilometer directional drilling rig[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2022, 48(9): 140-147, 156. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022030103
    [7]HUANG Han, CHENG Xiaozhou, YUN Xiao, ZHOU Yu, SUN Yanjing. DA-GCN-based coal mine personnel action recognition method[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2021, 47(4): 62-66. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.17721
    [8]DANG Weichao, YAO Yuan, BAI Shangwang, GAO Gaimei, WU Zhefeng. Research on unloading drill-rod action identification in coal mine water exploratio[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2020, 46(7): 107-112. DOI: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2019070074
    [9]ZHAO Li-chang, WANG Cong-xiao. Design of Mine-used Onboard Display Device Based on MST717[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2011, 37(10): 16-18.
    [10]ZHANG Pei-ling, LI Hui. Digital Speech Recognition System Based on Hybrid Model of CHMM and MLP[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2009, 35(12): 64-68.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 邹丹,高扬. 基于能量谱特征分析的耦合电路故障识别系统. 自动化与仪器仪表. 2022(04): 124-128 .
    2. 张军,冯运,简子倪,钱晓豪,鄢阳,王先培. 电力设备专用测试装置校准平台测控机制研究. 仪表技术与传感器. 2020(10): 33-37 .
    3. 祝国源. 开放式电路板通用自动测试平台设计. 自动化仪表. 2020(11): 93-97 .
    4. 晏勇. 基于工程教育的电路板设计与制作教学改革与应用. 黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版). 2019(04): 28-31 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (265) PDF downloads (44) Cited by(6)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return