浅埋煤层火区多源遥感探测方法

Multi-source remote sensing detection method for shallow-buried coal fire areas

  • 摘要: 单一遥感探测手段无法兼顾地表温度与沉降响应双重特征,且难以排除季节、人为活动对火区探测结果的干扰,易造成火区误判。针对上述问题,结合热红外遥感与小基线集合成孔径雷达干涉测量(SBAS−InSAR)技术,提出了一种浅埋煤层火区多源遥感探测方法。首先,利用热红外遥感技术获取多季节长时序热红外数据,采用劈窗算法反演地表温度,并通过温度阈值分割法提取出温度异常区;然后,基于SBAS−InSAR技术获取干涉相位信息,并通过奇异值分解法求解地表沉降速率,从而划定沉降异常区;最后,对温度异常区与沉降异常区开展空间叠加分析,将同时存在温度异常与沉降异常的区域判定为火区。结果表明:① 火区地表温度差异与季节变化显著相关,非夏季时段煤火温度异常区特征更为突出;火区地表沉降具有稳定、持续的发育特征;通过热红外遥感提取的温度异常与SBAS−InSAR提取的沉降异常在时间维度上基本吻合,但在空间维度上存在一定差异。② 热红外遥感易受季节更替、地表环境扰动及高温异常像元丢失等因素干扰,导致火区探测面积偏小;SBAS−InSAR空间分辨率高、火区探测结果更贴合实际火区分布,但受地表回填及自然沉降影响难以单独圈定火区。③ 结合热红外遥感与SBAS−InSAR可有效削弱季节温差、人为活动对火区探测结果的影响,有效提升火区探测精度。

     

    Abstract: Single remote sensing techniques cannot simultaneously capture both surface temperature and surface subsidence characteristics, and are susceptible to interference from seasonal variations and human activities, which may lead to misidentification of coal fire areas. To address these limitations, this study proposed a multi-source remote sensing method for detecting shallow-buried coal fire areas by integrating thermal infrared remote sensing and Small Baseline Subset Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (SBAS-InSAR) technology. Multi-season, long-term thermal infrared data were first acquired using thermal infrared remote sensing. Surface temperature was then retrieved using the split-window algorithm, and temperature anomaly areas were extracted using the temperature threshold segmentation method. Interferometric phase information was subsequently obtained based on SBAS-InSAR, and surface subsidence rates were calculated using the singular value decomposition method to delineate subsidence anomaly areas. Finally, spatial overlay analysis was performed between the temperature anomaly areas and the subsidence anomaly areas, and regions exhibiting both temperature and subsidence anomalies were identified as coal fire areas. The results showed that: ① surface temperature variations in coal fire areas were strongly correlated with seasonal changes, and temperature anomalies were more pronounced during non-summer periods. In contrast, surface subsidence in coal fire areas exhibited stable and continuous development. The temperature anomalies extracted by thermal infrared remote sensing were generally consistent with the subsidence anomalies identified by SBAS-InSAR in the temporal dimension, whereas certain discrepancies existed in the spatial dimension. ② Thermal infrared remote sensing was susceptible to seasonal variation, surface environmental disturbances, and the loss of high-temperature anomalous pixels, resulting in an underestimation of coal fire areas. SBAS-InSAR, with its high spatial resolution, produced detection results that more closely matched the actual distribution of coal fire areas, but it could not independently delineate coal fire areas because of the influence of surface backfilling and natural subsidence. ③ The integration of thermal infrared remote sensing and SBAS-InSAR effectively reduces the influence of seasonal temperature differences and human activities on coal fire detection results and improves the detection accuracy of coal fire areas.

     

/

返回文章
返回