煤矿巷道内障碍物对烟气流动特性影响的实验研究

Experimental study on the influence of obstacles in coal mine tunnels on the flow characteristics of smoke

  • 摘要: 煤矿井下火灾产生的烟气在巷道内蔓延过程中,其流动状态易受到内部障碍物影响,容易形成局部烟气滞留区,增大毒害气体积聚风险,严重威胁人员安全疏散与救灾决策。为系统揭示障碍物对烟气流动特性的影响机制,本文基于粒子图像测速(PIV)实验方法,在1:10缩尺拱形巷道模型中开展研究,以燃烧檀香作为烟气与示踪粒子源,重点考察障碍物形状、高度及其与火源距离三个关键因素对回流涡旋演化及速度分布的影响。实验发现,针对障碍物形状方面,方形障碍物的固定几何前缘迫使烟气在尖角处发生强烈分离,形成结构稳定、范围较大的回流涡旋,最大烟气反向速度达-0.027m/s,回流涡旋高度为184mm,均显著高于圆形障碍物,因此相较于圆形障碍物,方形障碍物因其更强的烟气滞留能力而构成更高的风险,需在通风与疏散设计中被重点关注;针对障碍物高度方面,10mm高度的障碍物主要形成小范围、高速度的回流涡旋,而20mm高度的障碍物回流涡旋高度扩展至233mm,但最大烟气反向速度降至-0.015m/s,形成大范围、低速度的回流涡旋,因此高大障碍物尽管涡旋流动速度减弱,但其形成的大范围烟气滞留区增加了有毒气体的聚集空间和人员受困风险;针对火源与障碍物之间的距离方面,在10-20mm时,烟气冲击剧烈,涡旋结构未能充分发展,最大烟气反向速度约为-0.020m/s;在20-30mm时,涡旋结构最为稳定,速度达到峰值约-0.028m/s,随着距离进一步增大至30-40mm,涡旋被推向下游,速度减弱至约-0.023m/s,在40-50mm时,烟气速度进一步降低约-0.021m/s,因此障碍物与火源之间存在临界距离20-30mm,此时速度达到峰值,涡旋结构最为稳定。距离过近时流动冲击剧烈,涡旋未能充分发展,距离过远时烟气速度衰减,涡旋流动明显减弱,在实际火灾风险评估中需结合障碍物位置进行针对性分析;以上研究成果对煤矿巷道烟气扩展规律提供理论支撑。

     

    Abstract: During the propagation of smoke generated by coal mine underground fires within tunnels, its flow state is high-ly susceptible to the influence of internal obstacles, often leading to the formation of localized smoke stagnation zones. This increases the risk of toxic gas accumulation and seriously threatens personnel evacuation and emer-gency decision-making. To systematically reveal the influence mechanisms of obstacles on smoke flow character-istics, this paper is based on the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) experimental method and conducted a study in a 1:10 scaled arched tunnel model. Burning sandalwood was used as the source of smoke and tracer particles, fo-cusing on three key factors: obstacle shape, height, and distance from the fire source, and their effects on the evo-lution of recirculation vortices and velocity distribution. Experiments revealed that regarding obstacle shape, the fixed geometric leading edge of a square obstacle forces the smoke to separate strongly at the sharp corners, forming a structurally stable and relatively large recirculation vortex. The maximum reverse smoke velocity reached -0.027 m/s, and the recirculation vortex height was 184 mm, both significantly higher than those of the circular obstacle. Therefore, compared to circular obstacles, square obstacles pose a higher risk due to their stronger smoke retention capacity and require greater attention in ventilation and evacuation design. Regarding obstacle height, a 10-mm high obstacle mainly formed a small-scale, high-velocity recirculation vortex, while a 20-mm high obstacle resulted in a vortex height extending to 233 mm, but the maximum reverse smoke velocity decreased to -0.015 m/s, forming a large-scale, low-velocity recirculation vortex. Thus, although the vortex flow velocity is weaker with taller obstacles, the large-scale smoke stagnation zone they create increases the accumula-tion space for toxic gases and the risk of personnel being trapped. Regarding the distance between the fire source and the obstacle, at 10-20 mm, the smoke impact was intense, and the vortex structure failed to fully develop, with a maximum reverse smoke velocity of approximately -0.020 m/s. At 20-30 mm, the vortex structure was most stable, and the velocity peaked at approximately -0.028 m/s. As the distance further increased to 30-40 mm, the vortex was pushed downstream, and the velocity weakened to about -0.023 m/s. At 40-50 mm, the smoke ve-locity further decreased to approximately -0.021 m/s. Therefore, there exists a critical distance of 20-30 mm be-tween the obstacle and the fire source, where the velocity peaks and the vortex structure is most stable. When the distance is too close, the intense flow impact prevents the vortex from fully developing; when the distance is too far, the smoke velocity decays, and the vortex flow weakens significantly. In practical fire risk assessment, target-ed analysis combined with obstacle position is necessary. The above research results provide theoretical support for the understanding of smoke spread patterns in coal mine tunnels.

     

/

返回文章
返回