露天煤矿剥采工作面车铲协同效率综合评价方法研究

Research on a comprehensive evaluation method for truck-shovel coordination efficiency in open-pit coal mine stripping faces

  • 摘要: 露天煤矿单斗−卡车工艺体系中,卡车与电铲间协同作业常出现“车等铲”“铲等车”等现象,进而导致工作面设备协同效率下降。现阶段针对协同作业评价的研究多聚焦于单一时间指标(如平均等待时长)或定性描述,难以全面覆盖成本损耗、能力发挥、节奏平稳、供需平衡等多维度需求,且存在指标边界模糊、数据支撑不足等问题,无法为调度优化提供精准量化依据。针对上述问题,提出了一种单斗−卡车工艺系统剥采工作面车铲协同效率综合评价方法。以等待成本、设备利用率、系统稳定性、产能匹配度为主控因素,构建了包含16项核心指标的综合评价体系;定义了结构化方程,将上述4个主控因素作为全局潜变量进行分析,通过拟合模型的方法实现了对评价体系标准化路径的定义。利用物元可拓理论确定了指标项的关联度计算方法,得出评价问题与各主控因素、二级因素间的权重关系,配合结构化方程中的标准化路径,完成整个评价体系的全局综合关联度计算。通过实例分析对协同作业状态及效率进行量化评价,确定4大主控因素间综合权重分别为0.286,0.258,0.231和0.255,其中产能匹配度权重最高,是影响铲运协同效率的关键因素。通过裁剪数据集中等待时间过长的数据项来构建对比实验,计算结果显示系统稳定性和等待成本2项的关联度指标显著得到改善,由−0.088 66,−0.056 83优化至−0.006 34,−0.077 48,评价等级由1分提升至3分。研究结果表明,将结构化方程模型与物元可拓评价方法结合,可有效应对协同作业评价中的多维耦合与边界模糊问题,为露天煤矿剥采工艺设备能力释放与运输调度优化提供可靠的量化决策支撑。

     

    Abstract: In the single-bucket–truck process system of open-pit coal mines, coordinated operations between trucks and electric shovels often experience phenomena such as "trucks waiting for shovels" or "shovels waiting for trucks", leading to decreased coordination efficiency of equipment at the working face. Current research on coordination evaluation mostly focuses on single time indicators (e.g., average waiting time) or qualitative descriptions, which struggle to comprehensively cover multidimensional demands such as cost loss, capacity utilization, operational steadiness, and supply–demand balance. Moreover, issues such as fuzzy indicator boundaries and insufficient data support make it difficult to provide precise quantitative foundations for scheduling optimization. To address the above problems, a comprehensive evaluation method for truck-shovel coordination efficiency in the single-bucket–truck process system at stripping faces was proposed. A comprehensive evaluation system comprising 16 core indicators was constructed from four main control factors: waiting cost, equipment utilization, system stability, and capacity matching degree. A structural equation model was defined to analyze the above four main controlling factors as global latent variables. The standardized paths of the evaluation system were established through model fitting, and reliability and validity analyses were further conducted to verify the practical effectiveness and reliability of the structural equation model. Using matter-element extension theory, the correlation degree calculation method for indicators was determined, deriving weight relationships between the evaluation problem and various primary and secondary controlling factors. Combined with the standardized paths from the structural equation model, the global comprehensive correlation degree of the entire evaluation system was calculated. Through case analysis, the coordination status and efficiency were quantitatively evaluated. Results showed that the comprehensive weights of the four primary controlling factors were 0.286, 0.258, 0.231, and 0.255, respectively, with capacity matching degree having the highest weight, indicating it as the key factor affecting truck-shovel coordination efficiency. By removing data items with excessively long waiting times from the dataset to construct a comparative experiment, the correlation degree indicators for system stability and waiting cost were significantly improved, changing from –0.088 66 and –0.056 83 to –0.006 34 and –0.077 48, respectively, and the evaluation grade increased from 1 to 3. The research results demonstrate that combining the structural equation model with matter-element extension theory can effectively address the multidimensional coupling and boundary fuzziness problems in coordination evaluation, providing reliable quantitative decision support for equipment capacity release and transportation scheduling optimization in open-pit coal mine stripping processes.

     

/

返回文章
返回