Volume 49 Issue 5
May  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GUI Gaihua, YUAN Zhanjiang. Speed control method for belt conveyor based on improved BP-PID[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2023,49(5):104-111.  doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022080058
Citation: GUI Gaihua, YUAN Zhanjiang. Speed control method for belt conveyor based on improved BP-PID[J]. Journal of Mine Automation,2023,49(5):104-111.  doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022080058

Speed control method for belt conveyor based on improved BP-PID

doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022080058
  • Received Date: 2022-08-21
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-05-15
  • Available Online: 2023-05-22
  • The traditional BP-PID control algorithm uses the gradient descent method to solve, which has problems such as slow convergence speed, easy trapping in local extremum, and performance degradation under low signal-to-noise ratio (LSNR) conditions. In order to solve the above problems, a BP PID belt conveyor speed control method (ImGSAA-BP-PID) based on improved genetic simulated annealing algorithm (ImGSAA) optimization is proposed. Firstly, the values of crossover and mutation probabilities are correlated with the iteration time. The inverse cosine function is introduced to enhance the dynamic adjustment and nonlinear change adaptability of GSAA. Secondly, by weighting the traditional Metropolis criterion, a weighted Metropolis criterion is proposed to modify the new population individuals and improve the noise robustness of genetic simulated annealing algorithm (GSAA). Finally, ImGSAA is used to optimize the initial parameters of BP-PID, automatically determining the optimal parameter combination for BP-PID. It improves its real-time parameter tuning, control precision, and adaptability to the LSNR environment. The experimental results show the following points. ① ImGSAA only needs 11 iterations to converge, indicating that optimizing the GSAA using the proposed improved crossover and mutation strategies and weighted Metropolis criteria can effectively improve the convergence speed and real-time performance of the algorithm. ② The control error of ImGSAA-BP-PID is −0.468 5-0.572 3 m/s, which is 224.88%, 104.07%, and 38.33% higher than the control methods based on genetic algorithm (GA)-BP PID, particle swarm optimization (PSO)-BP PID, and GSAA-BP-PID, respectively. ③ The performance of ImGSAA is least affected by LSNR. It converges to the global optimal solution after 15 iterations, which has strong noise robustness. ④ Under LSNR conditions, the average control error of ImGSAA-BP-PID decreases by 3.54%. The control performance is significantly better than GA-BP-PID, PSO-BP-PID, and GSAA-BP-PID, which better meets the practical engineering application requirements.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    方崇全. 煤矿带式输送机巡检机器人关键技术研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2022,50(5):263-270.

    FANG Chongquan. Research on key technology of inspection robot for coal mine belt conveyor[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(5):263-270.
    [2]
    冯俊宾. 变频调速技术在带式输送机上的节能应用[J]. 机械研究与应用,2021,34(1):142-144.

    FENG Junbin. Energy saving application of frequency control technology in belt conveyor[J]. Mechanical Research & Application,2021,34(1):142-144.
    [3]
    杨春雨,顾振,张鑫,等. 基于深度学习的带式输送机煤流量双目视觉测量[J]. 仪器仪表学报,2021,41(8):164-174.

    YANG Chunyu,GU Zhen,ZHANG Xin,et al. Binocular vision measurement of coal flow of belt conveyors based on deep learning[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument,2021,41(8):164-174.
    [4]
    胡宗镇,赵延立. 基于改进型BP神经网络自整定的PID控制[J]. 电脑与信息技术,2019,27(1):11-13.

    HU Zongzhen,ZHAO Yanli. PID control based on self-adjusting BP neural network[J]. Computer and Information Technology,2019,27(1):11-13.
    [5]
    郭伟东,李明,亢俊明,等. 基于机器视觉的矿井输煤系统优化节能控制[J]. 工矿自动化,2020,46(10):69-75.

    GUO Weidong,LI Ming,KANG Junming,et al. Optimal energy saving control of mine coal transportation system based on machine vision[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2020,46(10):69-75.
    [6]
    WANG Guimei,LU Shenghui,LIU Jiehui,et al. Coal volume measurement of belt conveyor based on image processing[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica,2020,41(6):724-728.
    [7]
    曹松青,郝万君. 基于NMPC−PID的大型风电机组独立变桨距载荷控制[J]. 计算机应用与软件,2020,37(10):34-40.

    CAO Songqing,HAO Wanjun. Individual pitch load control of large wind turbines based on NMPC-PID[J]. Computer Applications and Software,2020,37(10):34-40.
    [8]
    韩东升,杜永贵,庞宇松,等. 基于预见控制的带式输送机调速节能方法[J]. 工矿自动化,2018,44(6):64-68.

    HAN Dongsheng,DU Yonggui,PANG Yusong,et al. Speed regulation energy saving method of belt conveyor based on preview control[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2018,44(6):64-68.
    [9]
    张文静,曹博文,刘曰锋,等. 基于分数阶滑模自适应神经网络的中速磁浮列车运行控制方法[J]. 中国铁道科学,2022,43(2):152-160.

    ZHANG Wenjing,CAO Bowen,LIU Yuefeng,et al. Operation control method for medium-speed maglev trains based on fractional order sliding mode adaptive neural network[J]. China Railway Science,2022,43(2):152-160.
    [10]
    龚桂荣. 皮带机巡检机器人控制系统设计与研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.

    GONG Guirong. Design and research on an inspection robot control system for belt conveyor[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2019.
    [11]
    彭月,苏芷玄,杨杰,等. 基于PSO−BP−PID单点混合悬浮球控制算法研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2022,19(6):1511-1520.

    PENG Yue,SU Zhixuan,YANG jie,et al. On hybrid single-point magnetic levitation ball control algorithm based on BP-PID[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering,2022,19(6):1511-1520.
    [12]
    吉建华,苗长云,李现国,等. 基于PSO带式输送机PID控制器参数智能整定的适应度函数设计[J]. 机械工程学报,2022,58(3):1123-1129.

    JI Jianhua,MIAO Changyun,LI Xianguo,et al. Design of fitness function for intelligent parameter tuning of PID controller on belt conveyor with PSO[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2022,58(3):1123-1129.
    [13]
    王卉. 基于模糊PID理论的带式输送机调速系统设计[J]. 煤矿机械,2019,40(9):14-16.

    WANG Hui. Design of speed regulation system for belt conveyor based on fuzzy PID theory[J]. Coal Mine Machinery,2019,40(9):14-16.
    [14]
    曹江卫,魏霞. 基于RBF−PID控制器的带式输送机自适应调速系统[J]. 煤矿机械,2020,41(5):203-205.

    CAO Jiangwei,WEI Xia. Adaptive speed regulation system of belt conveyor based on RBF-PID controller[J]. Coal Mine Machinery,2020,41(5):203-205.
    [15]
    李航,杜璠,胡晓兵,等. 改进的BP神经网络PID控制器在气体浓度控制中的研究[J]. 四川大学学报(自然科学版),2020,57(6):1103-1109.

    LI Hang,DU Fan,HU Xiaobing,et al. Research on improved BP neural network PID controller in gas concentration control[J]. Journal of Sichuan University(Natural Science Edition),2020,57(6):1103-1109.
    [16]
    杨华伟,帕孜来•马合木提,张毅. PSO−BP−PID算法在双容水箱系统中的应用[J]. 电气传动,2017,47(5):78-80.

    YANG Huawei,PAZILAI Mahemuti,ZHANG Yi. Application of PSO-BP-PID algorithm in double tank water system[J]. Electric Drive,2017,47(5):78-80.
    [17]
    朱馨渝,马平. 基于改进PSO−BP神经网络的PID参数优化方法[J]. 现代电子技术,2022,45(21):127-130.

    ZHU Xinyu,MA Ping. PID parameter optimization method based on improved PSO-BP neural network[J]. Modern Electronics Technique,2022,45(21):127-130.
    [18]
    SRINIVAS M,PATNAIK L M. Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics,1994,24(4):656-667. doi: 10.1109/21.286385
    [19]
    GAO Chenyang, GAO Yuelin, LV Shanshan. Improved simulated annealing algorithm for flexible job shop scheduling problems[C]. Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Yinchuan, 2016: 2223-2228.
    [20]
    WANG Zheng,WANG Bo,LIU Chun,et al. Improved BP neural network algorithm to wind power forecast[J]. The Journal of Engineering,2017(13):940-943.
    [21]
    郭彩杏,郭晓金,柏林江. 改进遗传模拟退火算法优化BP算法研究[J]. 小型微型计算机系统,2019,40(10):2063-2067.

    GUO Caixing,GUO Xiaojin,BAI Linjiang. Rsearch on improved BP algorithm for genetic simulated annealing algorithm[J]. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems,2019,40(10):2063-2067.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (149) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return