井下碎软煤层顶板加砂分段压裂瓦斯高效抽采技术

孙四清; 李文博

doi:10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18050

井下碎软煤层顶板加砂分段压裂瓦斯高效抽采技术

doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18050

孙四清^{1, 2,},
李文博^{1, 2}

1.
煤炭科学研究总院, 北京　100013
2.
中煤科工西安研究院(集团)有限公司, 陕西西安　710077

基金项目: 国家科技重大专项项目（2016ZX05045-002）。

详细信息

作者简介:
孙四清（1977—），男，河南新县人，研究员，博士，主要从事煤矿瓦斯治理及煤层气勘探开发工作，E-mail:sunsiqing@cctegxian.com

中图分类号: TD712.6
计量
- 文章访问数: 148
- HTML全文浏览量: 45
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-10-24
- 修回日期: 2022-12-12
- 网络出版日期: 2022-12-26

High-efficiency gas extraction technology of staged fracturing roof with sand of underground broken and soft coal seam

SUN Siqing^{1, 2
,},
LI Wenbo^{1, 2}

1.
China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China
2.
CCTEG Xi'an Research Institute(Group) Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710077, China

摘要

摘要: 碎软煤层瓦斯治理常采用的底板穿层钻孔抽采瓦斯方式存在掘进工程量大、治理周期长、钻孔揭煤段短、抽采治理效果受限等问题，顺层短孔抽采方式存在成孔性差、抽采钻孔短、抽采区域小等问题。通过统计淮北、淮南、焦作、晋城、阳泉5个典型碎软煤层矿区煤层及其顶底板围岩力学参数和地应力，可得顶板岩层弹性模量为碎软煤层的2.56~6.71倍，泊松比为煤层的0.48~0.84倍，分析认为碎软煤层顶板岩层具有高弹性模量、低泊松比特征，顶板较碎软煤层更易压裂改造。参考地面煤层气水平井顶板加砂分段压裂思路，提出了井下碎软煤层顶板加砂分段压裂瓦斯抽采思路，即在煤层顶板稳定岩层中施工定向长钻孔（与煤层距离一般小于10 m），对钻孔由里向外逐段携砂压裂，形成以定向长钻孔将岩层完全联通、煤岩层中压裂缝网将煤层充分沟通的多级缝网，通过支撑剂保障缝网处于开启状态，实现碎软煤层瓦斯顶板定向长钻孔大区域高效抽采。建立了山西新景矿煤业有限责任公司某工作面3号煤层顶板加砂压裂地质模型，采用FracproPT软件对煤层及顶板水力加砂压裂进行数值模拟，得出顶板压裂裂缝在垂直方向上主要向煤层延伸，在水平方向上压裂缝长为煤层压裂缝长的3.49倍，表明碎软煤层顶板间接压裂较煤层直接压裂效果更好。在该工作面3号煤层顶板施工2个609 m定向长钻孔进行水力加砂分段压裂瓦斯抽采工程应用试验，2个钻孔压裂影响半径为20~38 m，压裂钻孔瓦斯抽采纯量分别为1 025.11，2 810.60 m³/d，百米瓦斯抽采纯量为同区域顺层未压裂钻孔的5.6~15.4倍，实现了碎软煤层大区域瓦斯高效抽采。
- 瓦斯抽采 /
- 碎软煤层 /
- 顶板定向钻进 /
- 水力加砂分段压裂
Abstract: The gas extraction method of floor cross-layer drilling commonly used in gas control of broken and soft coal seam has problems such as large excavation quantity, long control period, short coal uncovering section of drilling, limited extraction control effect and so on. The gas extraction method of bedding short hole has problems such as poor drill-forming property, short extraction drilling hole, small extraction area and so on. This paper makes statistics on mechanical parameters and in-situ stress of coal seams and their roof and floor surrounding rocks in five typical broken and soft coal seam mining areas in Huaibei, Huainan, Jiaozuo, Jincheng and Yangquan. It is concluded that the elastic modulus of roof rock is 2.56-6.71 times of that of the broken and soft coal seam. The Poisson's ratio is 0.48-0.84 times of that of the coal seam. The analysis shows that roof rock of broken and soft coal seam is characterized by high elastic modulus and low Poisson's ratio. The roof is easier to be fractured than broken and soft coal seam. Referring to the idea of staged fracturing roof with sand of the horizontal borehole of surface coalbed methane, the idea of gas extraction by staged fracturing roof with sand of underground broken and soft coal seam is put forward. The directional long boreholes in stable strata of coal seam roof are constructed. The boreholes are generally less than 10 m away from the coal seam. The sand-carrying fracturing shall be carried out from the inside to the outside section by section in the boreholes. It will form a multi-stage fracture network in which the rock layer fully connects through directional long holes and the coal seam fully connects through fracture network in coal strata. The proppant is used to ensure that the fracturing network is in open state, so as to realize efficient gas extraction in a large area by the directional long hole in roof of broken and soft coal seam. The geological model of fracturing roof with sand in No.3 coal seam of a working face in Shanxi Xinjing Coal Industry Co., Ltd. is established. The numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing coal seam and roof with sand is carried out by using FracproPT software. The result shows that the fracturing cracks in roof mainly extend to the coal seam in vertical direction. The length of fracturing cracks in roof in horizontal direction is 3.49 times of that of fracturing cracks in coal seam. This result shows that indirectly fracturing roof of broken and soft coal seam is better than directly fracturing the coal seam. Two 609 m directional long boreholes are drilled in roof of the No.3 coal seam in the working face to carry out gas extraction engineering application test of hydraulic staged fracturing with sand. The fracturing influence radius of the two boreholes is 20-38 m. The gas extraction pure amount of the fracturing holes is 1 025.11 m³/d and 2 810.60 m³/d respectively. The gas extraction pure amount of 100 m is 5.6-15.4 times of that of bedding un-fracturing boreholes in the same area. This study realizes high-efficiency gas extraction in a large area of broken and soft coal seam.
- gas extraction /
- broken and soft coal seam /
- directional drilling in roof /
- hydraulic staged fracturing with sand

HTML全文

图 1 井下碎软煤层顶板加砂分段压裂瓦斯高效抽采

Figure 1. Efficient gas extraction by staged fracturing roof with sand of underground broken and soft coal seam

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 煤层及顶板水力加砂压裂地质模型

Figure 2. Geological model for hydraulic fracturing coal seam and roof with sand

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 煤层水力加砂压裂模拟裂缝形态

Figure 3. Simulated crack shape of hydraulic fracturing coal seam with sand

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 顶板水力加砂压裂模拟裂缝形态

Figure 4. Simulated crack shape of hydraulic fracturing roof with sand

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 压裂钻孔布置及分段情况

Figure 5. Arrangement and segmentation of fracturing boreholes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 典型压裂段泵注压力与排量变化曲线

Figure 6. Variation curves of pump injection pressure and displacement of typical fracturing sections

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 典型碎软煤层矿区煤层与顶底板岩层力学参数及地应力

Table 1. Mechanics parameters and in-situ stress of coal, roof rock and floor rock in typical broken and soft coal seam mines

矿区及煤层	煤岩类型	埋深/m	厚度/m	弹性模量 /GPa	泊松比	最小水平主应力/MPa	最大主应力（垂向应力）/MPa
淮北矿区 8号煤	砂质泥岩（顶板）	724.90	4.30	26.00	0.27	8.97	16.95
	8号煤层	730.30	10.20	7.20	0.40	7.81	17.09
	砂质泥岩（底板）	740.50	0.80	19.50	0.30	10.23	17.17
淮南矿区 13号煤	砂岩（顶板）	809.72	5.00	3.09	0.28	10.02	18.96
	13号煤层	815.40	2.80	0.70	0.37	8.75	19.05
	砂岩（底板）	820.45	4.25	4.68	0.25	11.30	19.18
焦作矿区 2号煤	砂岩（顶板）	1 215.05	2.30	3.12	0.27	13.22	28.16
	2号煤层	1 217.35	6.80	1.22	0.36	11.60	28.22
	泥岩（底板）	1 224.15	2.50	2.02	0.28	13.37	28.37
晋城矿区 3号煤	砂岩（顶板）	725.41	37.79	2.36	0.32	10.84	15.80
	3号煤层	763.20	4.69	0.85	0.38	9.70	15.90
	砂岩（底板）	770.40	7.20	2.52	0.29	10.54	15.80
阳泉矿区 3号煤	砂岩（顶板）	508.45	7.40	14.10	0.13	6.57	12.81
	3号煤层	515.85	2.10	2.10	0.27	5.50	12.88
	泥岩（底板）	521.13	5.28	1.85	0.16	6.65	13.01

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 煤层和顶板水力加砂压裂数值模拟参数

Table 2. Numerical simulation parameters of hydraulic fracturing coal seam and roof with sand

钻孔裸眼段长度/m	泵注排量/ （m³·min⁻¹）	前置液体积/m³	携砂液体积/m³	顶替液体积/m³	加砂量/ m³	砂比/ %
10	1	35	105	35	2.1	2

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 分段压裂施工参数

Table 3. Construction parameters of staged fracturing

钻孔	压裂段	压裂液体积/m³	压力/ MPa	核桃壳砂质量/t	KCl 质量/t	杀菌剂质量/t	砂比 /%
1号钻孔	1	153.76	25.7~29.6	1.76	0.90	0.045	2.05
	2	157.99	27.2~29.4	1.85	0.97	0.085	2.02
	3	177.04	27.3~29.1	2.37	1.01	0.106	2.10
	4	159.70	21.3~25.3	2.41	1.23	0.112	2.22
	5	160.36	16.6~21.7	2.39	1.26	0.110	2.23
	6	155.07	18.2~22.6	2.33	1.33	0.132	2.23
小计		963.92	−	13.11	6.70	0.590	−
2号钻孔	1	170.14	22.4~28.1	2.22	1.76	0.117	2.21
	2	194.94	22.2~29.3	2.01	2.08	0.139	2.12
	3	189.38	25.2~27.9	2.34	1.56	0.104	2.36
	4	166.48	24.2~27.6	2.02	1.48	0.098	2.35
	5	181.05	22.2~27.4	2.78	1.76	0.117	2.33
	6	176.62	19.5~27.5	2.18	1.67	0.111	2.36
	7	179.71	22.1~25.9	1.79	1.44	0.096	2.22
	8	174.86	21.2~28.0	2.02	1.67	0.111	2.43
	9	176.31	21.2~27.8	2.50	1.65	0.110	2.36
	10	235.11	23.3~26.5	3.49	2.13	0.142	2.56
小计		1 844.60	−	23.36	17.20	1.146	−

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(21)

[1]	王恩元,张国锐,张超林,等. 我国煤与瓦斯突出防治理论技术研究进展与展望[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(1):297-322. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg21.1846 WANG Enyuan,ZHANG Guorui,ZHANG Chaolin,et al. Research progress and prospect on theory and technology for coal and gas outburst control and protection in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(1):297-322. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg21.1846
[2]	李泉新,方俊,褚志伟,等. 青龙煤矿碎软煤层顺层定向钻孔钻进试验研究[J]. 工矿自动化,2018,44(11):1-6. LI Quanxin,FANG Jun,CHU Zhiwei,et al. Drilling experiment research on bedding directional drilling of soft-fragmentized coal seam of Qinglong Coal Mine[J]. Industry and Mine Automation,2018,44(11):1-6.
[3]	张倩,栗磊. 水力造穴增透预抽在掘进面区域防突中的应用试验[J]. 煤炭工程,2019,51(11):65-68. ZHANG Qian,LI Lei. Application test of permeability enhancement by hydraulic jet cavity in regional outburst prevention of heading face[J]. Coal Engineering,2019,51(11):65-68.
[4]	孙四清,张俭,安鸿涛. 松软突出煤层穿层洞穴完井钻孔瓦斯抽采实践[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2012,40(2):49-51,55. doi: 10.13199/j.cst.2012.02.54.sunsq.020 SUN Siqing,ZHANG Jian,AN Hongtao. Practices on gas drainage with cavity completion borehole passing through soft and outburst seam[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2012,40(2):49-51,55. doi: 10.13199/j.cst.2012.02.54.sunsq.020
[5]	孙大发,陈久福,龙建明,等. 高压水力压裂技术在石门揭煤中的试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2013,41(增刊2):163-165. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2013.s2.082 SUN Dafa,CHEN Jiufu,LONG Jianming,et al. Experimental study on high pressure hydraulic fracturing technology to uncover coal in cross-cut[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2013,41(S2):163-165. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2013.s2.082
[6]	蔡峰,刘泽功. 深部低透气性煤层上向穿层水力压裂强化增透技术[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(1):113-119. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2015.9014 CAI Feng,LIU Zegong. Simulation and experimental research on upward cross-seams hydraulic fracturing in deep and low-permeability coal seam[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):113-119. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2015.9014
[7]	孙四清,郑凯歌. 井下高压水射流切割煤层增透效果数值模拟[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2017,45(2):45-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.02.008 SUN Siqing,ZHENG Kaige. Numerical simulation study on permeability enhancement effect of high pressure water cutting coal seam[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2017,45(2):45-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.02.008
[8]	姚宁平,张杰,李泉新,等. 煤矿井下梳状定向孔钻进技术研究与实践[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2012,40(5):30-34. doi: 10.13199/j.cst.2012.05.34.yaonp.016 YAO Ningping,ZHANG Jie,LI Quanxin,et al. Researchment and application of comb type directional borehole drilling technology in underground mine[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2012,40(5):30-34. doi: 10.13199/j.cst.2012.05.34.yaonp.016
[9]	李泉新,石智军,史海岐. 煤矿井下定向钻进工艺技术的应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2014,42(2):85-88,92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2014.02.018 LI Quanxin,SHI Zhijun,SHI Haiqi. The application of directional drilling technology in coal mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2014,42(2):85-88,92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2014.02.018
[10]	孙四清,张群,闫志铭,等. 碎软低渗高突煤层井下长钻孔整体水力压裂增透工程实践[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(9):2337-2344. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.0689 SUN Siqing,ZHANG Qun,YAN Zhiming,et al. Practice of permeability enhancement through overall hydraulic fracturing of long hole in outburst-prone soft crushed coal seam with low permeability[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(9):2337-2344. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.0689
[11]	牟全斌. 井下穿层长钻孔水力压裂强化增透技术[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(8):164-169. doi: 10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.08.026 MOU Quanbin. Strengthened permeability enhancement technology by hydraulic fracturing for underground layer-through long borehole[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(8):164-169. doi: 10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.08.026
[12]	陈冬冬,孙四清,张俭,等. 井下定向长钻孔水力压裂煤层增透技术体系与工程实践[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2020,48(10):84-89. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2020.10.009 CHEN Dongdong,SUN Siqing,ZHANG Jian,et al. Technical system and engineering practice of coal seam permeability improvement through underground directional long borehole hydraulic fracturing[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2020,48(10):84-89. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2020.10.009
[13]	郑凯歌. 碎软低透煤层底板梳状长钻孔分段水力压裂增透技术研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2020,37(2):272-281. doi: 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2020.02.007 ZHENG Kaige. Permeability improving technology by sectional hydraulic fracturing for comb-like long drilling in floor of crushed and soft coal seam with low permeability[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2020,37(2):272-281. doi: 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2020.02.007
[14]	ZHANG Jingfei,SUN Siqing,LI Shugang,et al. Research and engineering practice of high-efficiency gas extraction technology by hydraulic fracturing:a case study of Huanglong Coalfeld in China[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2022,15:1012. doi: 10.1007/s12517-022-10299-9
[15]	贾秉义,陈冬冬,吴杰,等. 煤矿井下顶板梳状长钻孔分段压裂强化瓦斯抽采实践[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(2):70-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.02.009 JIA Bingyi,CHEN Dongdong,WU Jie,et al. Practice of enhanced gas extraction by staged fracturing with comb-shaped long hole in coal mine roof[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(2):70-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.02.009
[16]	张群,葛春贵,李伟,等. 碎软低渗煤层顶板水平井分段压裂煤层气高效抽采模式[J]. 煤炭学报,2018,43(1):150-159. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.1422 ZHANG Qun,GE Chungui,LI Wei,et al. A new model and application of coalbed methane high efficiency production from broken soft and low permeable coal seam by roof strata-in horizontal well and staged hydraulic fracture[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(1):150-159. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.1422
[17]	巫修平,张群. 碎软低渗煤层顶板水平井分段压裂裂缝扩展规律及控制机制[J]. 天然气地球科学,2018,29(2):268-276. WU Xiuping,ZHANG Qun. Research on controlling mechanism of fracture propagation of multi-stage hydraulic fracturing horizontal well in roof of broken soft and low permeability coal seam[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2018,29(2):268-276.
[18]	许耀波,郭盛强. 软硬煤复合的煤层气水平井分段压裂技术及应用[J]. 煤炭学报,2019,44(4):1169-1177. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2018.1691 XU Yaobo,GUO Shengqiang. Technology and application of staged fracturing in coalbed methane horizontal well of soft and hard coal composite coal seam[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2019,44(4):1169-1177. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2018.1691
[19]	陈诚,雷征东,房茂军,等. 致密砂岩储层可压性评价与极限参数压裂技术[J]. 科学技术与工程,2022,22(16):6400-6407. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.16.004 CHEN Cheng,LEI Zhengdong,FANG Maojun,et al. Tight sandstone reservoir compressibility evaluation and limit parameter fracturing technology[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2022,22(16):6400-6407. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.16.004
[20]	姜在炳,李浩哲,许耀波,等. 煤层顶板分段压裂水平井地质适应性分析与施工参数优化[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(3):183-192. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.01.0037 JIANG Zaibing,LI Haozhe,XU Yaobo,et al. Geological adaptability analysis and operational parameter optimization for staged fracturing horizontal wells in coal seam roof[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(3):183-192. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.01.0037
[21]	雷毅,武文宾,陈久福. 松软煤层井下水力压裂增透技术及应用[J]. 煤矿开采,2015,20(1):105-107. doi: 10.13532/j.cnki.cn11-3677/td.2015.01.031 LEI Yi,WU Wenbin,CHEN Jiufu. Technology of underground permeability improvement of soft coal-seam with hydrofracture and its application[J]. Coal Mining Technology,2015,20(1):105-107. doi: 10.13532/j.cnki.cn11-3677/td.2015.01.031

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

图(6) / 表(3)

计量

文章访问数: 148
HTML全文浏览量: 45
PDF下载量: 12
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

井下碎软煤层顶板加砂分段压裂瓦斯高效抽采技术

doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18050

作者简介:
孙四清（1977—），男，河南新县人，研究员，博士，主要从事煤矿瓦斯治理及煤层气勘探开发工作，E-mail:sunsiqing@cctegxian.com

计量

High-efficiency gas extraction technology of staged fracturing roof with sand of underground broken and soft coal seam

计量

目录

留言板

井下碎软煤层顶板加砂分段压裂瓦斯高效抽采技术

doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18050

作者简介: 孙四清（1977—），男，河南新县人，研究员，博士，主要从事煤矿瓦斯治理及煤层气勘探开发工作，E-mail:sunsiqing@cctegxian.com

计量

出版历程

High-efficiency gas extraction technology of staged fracturing roof with sand of underground broken and soft coal seam

计量

出版历程

目录

作者简介:
孙四清（1977—），男，河南新县人，研究员，博士，主要从事煤矿瓦斯治理及煤层气勘探开发工作，E-mail:sunsiqing@cctegxian.com